Nathan Lively
Nathan Lively
  • 451
  • 2 070 726
How to Buy and Sell Used Gear
Interview with Mendel Rosenberg of Gearsupply about how to get the best deals on used production hardware without getting scammed or violating tax laws.
www.sounddesignlive.com/how-to-buy-and-sell-used-gear-rosenberg-gearsupply
___
💙 Start supporting Sound Design Live today for as little as $5/month on Patreon: www.patreon.com/sounddesignlive
___
⏱️ SubAligner: www.subaligner.com/
___
📕 Books and courses on sound system tuning - www.sounddesignlive.com/audio-engineer-training-programs/
___
Smaart® and the Smaart logo are registered trademarks of Rational Acoustics LLC and are not affiliated with Nathan Lively or Sound Design Live.
___
Be friendly
Facebook - sounddesignlive/
Twitter - nathandofrango
LinkedIn - www.linkedin.com/in/nathanlively/
___
I love to geek out about the physics of sound. This channel focuses on the growing opportunity for live sound engineers to improve their confidence and consistency through the understanding of the principles of sound system design and optimization. My goal is to make this channel upfront and honest about my success and failure, so you can learn from both.
I am always open to suggestions and feedback so please comment on this video or contact me through my site.
Переглядів: 184

Відео

Why EQ Is Not the Answer to Microphone Feedback with Jason Romney
Переглядів 6 тис.3 місяці тому
Originally from Live Sound Summit: livesoundsummit2020.sounddesignlive.com/talks/jason-romney/ Gain Before Feedback Is Independent of the Level of the Talker www.sounddesignlive.com/gain-before-feedback-is-independent-of-the-level-of-the-talker-jason-romney/
Should we window the impulse response?
Переглядів 1 тис.6 місяців тому
Windowing can be an important part of noise reduction of our measurements to aid in further investigation of interaction direct sound and reflections. This is a video response to the question from Toast on Toast in last week's live stream. I used the weird ai art because I thought it was funny. Real-world Alignment: Tips & Tricks 🤩: ua-cam.com/users/live_kIS1b83Mss Subwoofer Alignment: The Fool...
Managing On-site Sound Exposure and Off-site Noise Pollution with Adam Hill (Live Sound Summit 2020)
Переглядів 5736 місяців тому
Originally produced as part of Live Sound Summit 2020: livesoundsummit2020.sounddesignlive.com/talks/managing-on-site-sound-exposure-and-off-site-noise-pollution/ Understanding and managing sound exposure and noise pollution at outdoor events www.aes.org/technical/documents/AESTD1007_1_20_05.pdf WHO global standard for safe listening venues and events www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240043114
Fast Fill Speaker Alignment
Переглядів 1,4 тис.6 місяців тому
How to use distance measurements when you need a fast alignment solution between mains and fills. Adventures in Alignment 3: Rapid Response www.sounddesignlive.com/adventures-in-alignment-3-rapid-response/ SubAligner: www.subaligner.com/ 💙 Start supporting Sound Design Live today for as little as $5/month on Patreon: www.patreon.com/sounddesignlive 📈 Get Started with Sound System Tuning - www.s...
Delay speaker alignment with SubAligner
Переглядів 2,1 тис.8 місяців тому
Use the 1:1 preset in SubAligner for your full-range sources like delay, relay, and front-fill. www.subaligner.com/ 💙 Start supporting Sound Design Live today for as little as $5/month on Patreon: www.patreon.com/sounddesignlive 📈 Get Started with Sound System Tuning - www.sounddesignlive.com/get-started-with-sound-system-tuning/ 👨‍🎓 SOUND SYSTEM TUNING ONLINE COURSE - www.proaudioworkshopseein...
Subwoofer alignment without the distance measurements?
Переглядів 1,9 тис.8 місяців тому
I have a helpful little shortcut for you. In sound systems with a center sub array, you don't need to take distance measurements anymore to complete the relative absolute method. All you need are the pre-alignment delay values. You will need to apply an offset, though, if your sub array is not coplanar with your mains. I have applied this shortcut to SubAligner. If you choose Center on the Alig...
Overview of SubAligner v2.0
Переглядів 1,8 тис.9 місяців тому
Check out the new version of SubAligner. It's redesigned from the ground up to be faster, more reliable, and with new features to make your sound system alignment work even easier. www.subaligner.com/
Double Your Subs (without changing the pattern)
Переглядів 2,5 тис.10 місяців тому
How can you double the number of elements in your sub array without drastically changing the coverage pattern? If you know where the acoustic center lives then multiples subs can couple at that center without occupying the same physical space. Merlijn's low-frequency acoustic center calculator: www.merlijnvanveen.nl/en/study-hall/145-low-frequency-acoustic-center-calculator My other video: ua-c...
Sound System Setup Hacks: Calculating Main Array Distance (in direct sunlight)
Переглядів 2 тис.11 місяців тому
Sound System Setup Hacks: Calculating Main Array Distance (in direct sunlight)
Should I solo one side of my sub array during alignment?
Переглядів 1,9 тис.11 місяців тому
Should I solo one side of my sub array during alignment?
Should you align front-fills to subs?
Переглядів 4,1 тис.11 місяців тому
Should you align front-fills to subs?
The EQ Puzzle: What filters will break my perfect subwoofer crossover alignment?
Переглядів 2,2 тис.11 місяців тому
The EQ Puzzle: What filters will break my perfect subwoofer crossover alignment?
Add your speakers to SubAligner: Measure!
Переглядів 997Рік тому
Add your speakers to SubAligner: Measure!
Add your speakers to SubAligner: Practice
Переглядів 1,3 тис.Рік тому
Add your speakers to SubAligner: Practice
Add your speakers to SubAligner: REW
Переглядів 853Рік тому
Add your speakers to SubAligner: REW
Add your speakers to SubAligner: Planning
Переглядів 641Рік тому
Add your speakers to SubAligner: Planning
6 Ways to Conquer Noisy Phase Data and Master Your Sub Alignment
Переглядів 2,6 тис.Рік тому
6 Ways to Conquer Noisy Phase Data and Master Your Sub Alignment
No Technical Element Should Distract You from the Story on Stage
Переглядів 306Рік тому
No Technical Element Should Distract You from the Story on Stage
The Bass Whisperer: From Confusion to Alignment
Переглядів 3,2 тис.Рік тому
The Bass Whisperer: From Confusion to Alignment
Random Questions with Nick Malgieri from d&b
Переглядів 2,2 тис.Рік тому
Random Questions with Nick Malgieri from d&b
Will (d&b) Array Processing break your sub alignment?
Переглядів 2 тис.Рік тому
Will (d&b) Array Processing break your sub alignment?
IEM: The Recipe for Failure and How to Avoid It
Переглядів 1,4 тис.Рік тому
IEM: The Recipe for Failure and How to Avoid It
Ripple Demo: 0-10ms delay, LR12, 100Hz
Переглядів 1,6 тис.Рік тому
Ripple Demo: 0-10ms delay, LR12, 100Hz
Leica DISTO X4 *Giveaway* 🎉
Переглядів 511Рік тому
Leica DISTO X4 *Giveaway* 🎉
Join my new community for live sound engineers!
Переглядів 835Рік тому
Join my new community for live sound engineers!
SubAligner Walk Through and Q&A [Using SubAligner in the Field - Part 3]
Переглядів 689Рік тому
SubAligner Walk Through and Q&A [Using SubAligner in the Field - Part 3]
How do we know if we have good data? [Using SubAligner in the Field - Part 2]
Переглядів 1,2 тис.Рік тому
How do we know if we have good data? [Using SubAligner in the Field - Part 2]
Subwoofer alignment by ear?? [Using SubAligner in the Field - Part 1]
Переглядів 1,5 тис.Рік тому
Subwoofer alignment by ear?? [Using SubAligner in the Field - Part 1]
Why is the 125 Hz band so Important?
Переглядів 3,5 тис.Рік тому
Why is the 125 Hz band so Important?

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @pvanb291
    @pvanb291 3 дні тому

    Hey Nathan, I'm about to do a theatre show on an X32. Have done a previous one with a Allen & Heath SQ5, which has great scene control, but didn't think the Behringer did the same thing. Your video was great and gave me all the tools and processes to be fully in control for this production. Thanks heaps!

  • @ENDREVISZHANYO
    @ENDREVISZHANYO 5 днів тому

    you push the button, to keep the 5,9ms........you had another option to choose

  • @amvmaster4383
    @amvmaster4383 8 днів тому

    can't you just apply the necessery crossover and than correct the acoustical response to the target with eq ? this way you can change slopes and cross filters freely

  • @fronbasal
    @fronbasal 11 днів тому

    This was by far the most intuitive video about delays I could find on UA-cam. Thanks for sharing this publicly, a great resource! ❤

  • @aaronl7669
    @aaronl7669 22 дні тому

    i was just wondering about this topic. thanks!

  • @BenjaminSchickert
    @BenjaminSchickert 23 дні тому

    @Nathanlively, which program were you using for this video?

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively 21 день тому

      Hi Benjamin! Looks like CrossLite

  • @LaminarSound
    @LaminarSound 27 днів тому

    This was EXACTLY the explanation I was hoping I would find. I knew generally THAT this worked but hadnt yet see visually HOW. Thanks much.

  • @sebastianvivas5826
    @sebastianvivas5826 29 днів тому

    estub buen

  • @vitorgerhardt6925
    @vitorgerhardt6925 Місяць тому

    Sensacional!

  • @reverend11-dmeow89
    @reverend11-dmeow89 Місяць тому

    any updates for my 69th birthday back here in 2024? thnx mnx

  • @tony8236
    @tony8236 Місяць тому

    sorry if I have another question even if it's not the correct video. Do cardioid but in-line subwoofers give the same result? Of course if there is the possibility and you have enough space

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively Місяць тому

      Hey Tony, when it comes to gradient array, the effective bandwidth in front is controlled by the spacing which is fixed in an inverted gradient stack.

  • @user-ki7nq3bi3k
    @user-ki7nq3bi3k Місяць тому

    Can we use 24dB L-R for the Sub. And 12dB BW for the Full, while the nature respond are not the same?

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively Місяць тому

      As long as the result hits your target, sounds good, and is not damaging any of the component, you can use whatever filters you like. :)

    • @user-ki7nq3bi3k
      @user-ki7nq3bi3k Місяць тому

      @@nathanlively cool ❤️

  • @nicholasm2254
    @nicholasm2254 Місяць тому

    Is this being measured with a mic(s) only?

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively Місяць тому

      Hey Nicholas, yes, just 1 mic.

  • @nugeman7779
    @nugeman7779 Місяць тому

    We are too thin-skinned these days. Go ahead and be a jerk if you can tell me the absolute best equipment, positioning, and set-up. Dude, we can take it.

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively Місяць тому

      Blunt, honesty. You got it. :)

  • @the_nondrive_side
    @the_nondrive_side Місяць тому

    you might want to use the notch method on a Monitor on stage. but clearly only because it's affect for the feedback loop while no effective change to listener. each monitor will be able to be independantly adjusted hard limiting the monitor would really end the deal guitars with mics can be used with ISO cabs. plexi shields for drummers etc etc before you really ever need to notch the PA channels... and if you did you might only need to notch the 120s at the bottom of the tower

  • @tony8236
    @tony8236 2 місяці тому

    hello and thanks for this video. I'm using a translator because I don't speak English well. I tried this configuration and noticed that when the public subwoofer is on the ground I get almost 2 dB more. my question is: is it right to always use this way or are there occasions when it is better to have the audience subwoofer on high?

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively Місяць тому

      Hey Tony, I can't think of an example where I've used the opposite orientation, but I can imagine that if you had the same 2-element inverted gradient stack, but flown, you'd want it to be reversed in order to direct the cancellation towards the open mics on stage.

    • @tony8236
      @tony8236 Місяць тому

      @@nathanlively thank you so much. however on stage the cancellation seems the same. only that if I use the subwoofer at the bottom facing forward I have greater gain (2db from smaart tested in the same situation). perhaps due to the ground effect

  • @aaronl7669
    @aaronl7669 2 місяці тому

    can pretty much any top and sub be aligned using subaligner?

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively Місяць тому

      Hey Aaron, yes, that is the goal. To accomplish this, I either need the pre-alignment delay values from the manufacturer, or I need measurements of the speakers.

  • @user-ki7nq3bi3k
    @user-ki7nq3bi3k 2 місяці тому

    For those who did not know where the wrap around 10 milliseconds came from just like me. Frequency itself vibrates 100 cycles per second (100Hz). Therefore 1 Cycle should take 1/100 seconds to complete. While 1 second = 1000 milliseconds. 10ms is the time for frequency 100Hz to complete one cycle.

  • @michaelwright1602
    @michaelwright1602 2 місяці тому

    Yep, I just tried an active crossover with the Linkwitz filters, and it killed the sound coming out of my Maggies. Flat, lifeless, but the crossover worked. I went back to my non-Linkwitz pro audio crossover and we were back in business. I'm not a measurement guy, not with audio gear, for this very reason. So many folks go by measurements, just silly in my book, because in my experience, this is the result, crap sound.

  • @droy360
    @droy360 2 місяці тому

    Is Smaart software is free

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively Місяць тому

      No. The only free audio analyzer software I know of is REW.

  • @kevinwang7894
    @kevinwang7894 2 місяці тому

    What if the crossover is at 80Hz?

  • @JeOrillaza
    @JeOrillaza 2 місяці тому

    hi! we operate in a church campus, so we setup and strike down weekly. I didnt quite understand how to keep the Receivers stacked, without getting signal drops. You mentioned antenna about antenna splitters. how does that work? thank you

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively Місяць тому

      The easy solution is to unstack them and move them away from each other. Otherwise, yes, you can buy an antenna splitter. It will accept your two antennas as input, then it will duplicate that antenna signal with four or five outputs that you can connect to each of your receivers.

  • @duroxkilo
    @duroxkilo 2 місяці тому

    thank you

  • @sc0or
    @sc0or 2 місяці тому

    I didn't get a transition from an amplitude to a power... You imported an acoustical data and continued to work with electrical amplitude graphs. But.. When -3dB changed to -6dB pls?

  • @PauloSilva-gw3sk
    @PauloSilva-gw3sk 2 місяці тому

    What if we want a 3 line array instead of 2 ? Should we just reverse the 3rd one with no delay ? Making it kinda of a mix between cardioid and endfire ? Or you have a better idea ?

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively Місяць тому

      Hey Paulo, the only way I know how to do gradient with an odd number of subs is the inverted gradient stack. If you want three in a line, I think you're better off with an end-fire design. But, please experiment and let us know what you find out! :)

  • @oliviergoliard7937
    @oliviergoliard7937 2 місяці тому

    Hi ! How do you know if you're not aligning with a whole wavelengh delay (or 2 and so on...) ? Thanks.

  • @pmlaaudio468
    @pmlaaudio468 2 місяці тому

    What does the C mean in subaligner when you look at the result plot? …also Aligning Speakers that are phase compatible from the same manufacturer… could you recommend a video to watch on that

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively Місяць тому

      C = center. It's the geometric average between the start and end of the crossover region. > could you recommend a video to watch on that I would consult the manufacturer on that.

  • @brian_malota
    @brian_malota 3 місяці тому

    If you only have one mic, in my case a sonarworks reference ID RTA mic, would you suggest tuning my left right by just tuning one side (having mic as close to the speaker as possible and running pink through just that one speaker) and then copying and pasting the eq to both sides or would it be beneficial to run pink through both while being center to the two? Or would that create comb filtering?

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively 3 місяці тому

      Hey Brian, so you are just talking about the EQ step? Every speaker needs solo EQ and combined EQ. For example: 1. L solo EQ 2. R solo EQ 3. L+R combined EQ

  • @IswanjanaHariAdi
    @IswanjanaHariAdi 3 місяці тому

    Great video as usual Nathan, arguably the most well-explained all-pass filter usage in real alignment situation. Thank you!

  • @markgrzybek8116
    @markgrzybek8116 3 місяці тому

    Nathan, I just wanted to say thank you so very much for doing what you do and sharing all these wonderful and very informative videos, I know it's appreciated by many! I really like your style and please keep up the awesome work! Oh yeah, I too did the gas in a diesel truck thing once (hopefully never again) it ended costing me a little over a grand, still to this day I cannot pull up to a pump that has both diesel and gas without trembling from the traumatic experience and triple checking myself while filling up. Thanks again!

  • @serhatsoyyigit
    @serhatsoyyigit 3 місяці тому

    So we can give headphones to the listeners and make the gain 200db. What a wonderful world!

  • @takuoshima7206
    @takuoshima7206 3 місяці тому

    Thanks a lot for sharing this video! At first I was lazy to watch it because it lasted 1 hour, but when I started watching it I was hooked. It's exactly what I need at this moment. I have a project precisely to improve the GBF of the meeting space where I work, and all this information will help me to be able to explain it better to my colleagues and superiors.

  • @the-trusteeship
    @the-trusteeship 3 місяці тому

    Thank you.

  • @jthunderbass1
    @jthunderbass1 3 місяці тому

    Thanks for such a great video! I’m just starting to watch it. What about when the person on stage is whispering?

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively 3 місяці тому

      Hey jthunderbass1, tell me more.

  • @digital.wrangler
    @digital.wrangler 3 місяці тому

    @nathanlively Thanks a lot for this material, got a few eye-opening things from it. Also, a big thanks to Mr Jason Romney, for sharing this unique approach, and for sharing their whole book for free. Please keep it up, it's a real value for a sound nerds like me, who's interested in how and why things work. You're awesome!

  • @ItalRolando
    @ItalRolando 3 місяці тому

    I use feedback regularly as my spectrum analyzer and it didn’t lie me ever. And also, since feedback is defined as a 1:1 ratio between the pressure arriving at the microphone and entering it, (imagine a electronic circuit in short, or a ring that closes its edges), it can be used to set the right volume on your amps to produce the right spl for the event.

    • @ItalRolando
      @ItalRolando 3 місяці тому

      7:35 that’s exactly what I apply alle the time: I set the microphone to a spl reference (practically my voice because it produces 87 dBspl at 2 centimeter), I put the microphone in the venue where I want to get 87 dBspl, I set the console on a feedback condition, then slowly I raise the amp volume until I hear the feedback and then lower the volume few dBs. Now I know that in that spot the loudspeaker, in conjunction with the amp, is producing 87 dBspl. The benefits of this method are many but the most important one in my opinion is not amplifying useless noise because the amp are now correctly settled.

  • @StevenKellyMCC
    @StevenKellyMCC 3 місяці тому

    Feedback doesn't occur when the sound from the loudspeaker reaches the microphone at the same level as it would directly from the person speaking. It happens when the waves from the loudspeaker can get back to the loudspeaker via the microphone at a time such that their peaks match the peaks already coming out of the loudspeaker. It's that constructive interference that causes the increase in volume of that frequency, and since it continues on the next round, that frequency builds to the familiar squeal. Being the same level doesn't matter; the waves being in sync does.

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively 3 місяці тому

      Hey Steven, thanks for checking out the video and your comment. It's great that you bring up time, but I'm afraid we can't have one without the other. Where summation is based on magnitude and phase, magnitude is the tie breaker. If the waves as you describe them arrive at the right time, but are 40dB lower than the original signal then the possibility of constructive interference is near zero. So while the signals might not need to be exactly unity to ramp up to feedback, it's gotta be close. There's an AES paper called Using a Speech Codec to Suppress Howling in Public Address Systems. I found this quote very helpful: "In other words, a linear-time invariant model of a public address system is stable if the amplifier (including audio DSP) is stable, if the room is stable, and if at any radial frequency ωh where a sinewave traveling around the loop will perfectly constructively interfere with itself (i.e. the phase response is an integer multiple of 2π around the loop), then the magnitude response around the loop must be less than unity."

    • @StevenKellyMCC
      @StevenKellyMCC 3 місяці тому

      Hi Nathan, and thanks for the response. The AES paper is basically stating the Barkhausen criterion: for a stable state at a given frequency, the delay around the loop must be a whole number of waveforms of that frequency (to keep them in phase), and the gain around the loop for that frequency must be =1 (i.e. unity gain, +0 dB, so they get neither louder nor quieter). Maybe a misunderstanding of that is indeed at the root of the problem here. The Barkhausen criterion is for a stable result, so not a feedback howl but a continued singing that doesn't increase in volume. For audio feedback purposes, we know having more gain just makes the feedback happen faster and louder, so we can change the Barkhausen equation from 'gain = unity' to 'gain >= unity'. (The paper says 'less than unity' for 'stable', which is incorrect for the normal use of 'stable' in Barkhausen, but maybe just an unfortunate choice of a word to mean 'not feeding back'.) Note that the unity here has nothing to do with the original input signal, but only with the gain of the whole system. It really doesn't matter what the volume of the talker is. You don't even need a signal to start feedback, as we've all seen in practice: if the gain around the system at a given frequency is > unity, and that frequency stays in phase, then simply unmuting the mic means it can start to feed back. The background noise (either acoustic or electrical) is enough that the feedback frequency will be selectively amplified by the system. We can show this in an anechoic chamber, in total silence. Or rather more easily in a DAW like Reaper, by setting up a white noise generator at -85 dB (the sound floor of a Midas M32), a delay of 5ms (so 200 Hz and 1.72m - about the distance from a singer's mic to a wedge monitor). That -85 dB is a lot less than the -40 dB you mention, and isn't at a specific frequency (pink noise would be better for some points of view, but here we want electrical noise, and that's white). If we set the whole system so it's just below unity, and give a tiny boost of 0.2 dB at any frequency matching a multiple of the delay length just to get things started, we get feedback at that frequency. If we boost a frequency that would be out of phase over that delay, we don't get feedback: . We can even turn off the white noise after a few seconds, before you can even hear the boosted frequency, and that frequency will continue to grow and feed back. The video is simply incorrect in saying (many times, but e.g. slide at 8:00) that "Feedback happens when the sound from the loudspeaker arrives at the microphone at the same level as the sound from the talker". He uses that to mean ongoing level, like a VU meter would show, but even if he meant an instantaneous level of a single sample (which would take into account the phase of the two signals, as he points out briefly later), it's still incorrect. Even if we change it to be "instantaneous level of any of the sine waves which can be considered to form the sound", and require that it continues, then we still don't have feedback: we need >= unity gain around the system. I imagine there's no actual difference in understanding here (or at least I hope not), and it's just that Jason's attempt to formulate it has crystallized on a phrase that is actually incorrect, rather than just being incomplete. The level from the talker does not matter. Indeed, if we think of feedback as being nasty and loud, and wanting to avoid having equality with that level, Jason's phrase gives the impression that having the level from the talker lower would help stop feedback. As we know, the opposite is true - even if the instinctive reaction of most talkers on hearing feedback is to move the mic away from their mouth!

  • @timhoffmann5022
    @timhoffmann5022 3 місяці тому

    Literature says, that in reverberant rooms because of the many overlaying frequecies and thus combfiltering you have even less headroom for feedback occurance. Statistically beyind a specific frequency thats dependent on Roomvolume and T60 you statistically have the same Peak to Average Ratio in the Frequency Response which is 12 dB (Schroeder 1954, Schroeder & Kuttruff 1962, Ahnert & Reichert 1981). Kuttruff recommends even more Headroom on top for Speech (5 dB) and music (12dB) (Kuttruff & Hesselmann 1976). This results in a deduction in gain before feedback of 17dB for speech and 24dB for music in reverberant rooms. So the example in the video is only applicable for freefield.

  • @metalhead3172
    @metalhead3172 3 місяці тому

    Ok, but what are the odds that a person qualified to be employed as a sound engineer is going to show up to work & turn on a system in which the microphones are not going to be cardioid, the speakers are not already going to be positioned as optimum as the house will accommodate & the source is not already going to be at the optimum proximity to the microphone? Typically, when a person qualified for a position as a sound engineer resorts to using the EQ for stabilization, all the variables addressed in this video are as optimum as they are going to get &, essentially, any stabilization issues should only pertain to the stage monitors which, ideally, should be a secondary system isolated from the FOH system, but, even when they are a subsystem of FOH, the compromise in sonic quality for the sake of stabilization is tolerated. The fact of the matter is, in a professional real-world scenario, an engineer IS going to need to apply EQ'ing in an effort to achieve stability, but it should only pertain to the monitor system or subsystem... Ideally, aside from MAYBE a little roll off at the very top &/or very bottom of the spectrum & "flavoring to taste", if you will, the FOH EQ's, should be "flat"... Of course, the amount one may need to vary from "flat" to "flavor to taste" is relative to the inherent acoustic qualities of the venue... Or, if outdoors, the pertinent atmospheric conditions. That all been said... Three words: "In" "Ear" "Monitors"... "GBF" problem 𝗌̶𝗈̶𝗅̶𝗏̶𝖾̶𝖽̶...eliminated.

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively 3 місяці тому

      Hi metalhead. Thanks for your comment. I don't think Jason would spend his time talking about this stuff if he didn't think it was important because he sees a lot of his students doing it. I can also corroborate that I see lots of people reach for EQ before placement, aim, alignment, and other tools we have available.

  • @stephenstange4194
    @stephenstange4194 3 місяці тому

    Another question is the issue of multiple mics. The more mics, the lower the available gain. Isn’t it something like every time you double the number of open mics, you lose 3db (or is it 6?) of gain before feedback? ?

    • @whoosdaart4423
      @whoosdaart4423 3 місяці тому

      also interested in this as multiple open mics is a normal scenario for mixing bands x

    • @timhoffmann5022
      @timhoffmann5022 3 місяці тому

      Yes a doubling of open mics increases signal level (if you sum them) by 3 dB. and thus decreases gain before feedback.

  • @stephenstange4194
    @stephenstange4194 3 місяці тому

    On the question of why systems feedback when the band stops playing. I believe the most likely “culprit” is that all of your various compressors relax, effectively increasing the overall system gain. Remember, a compressor is a gain REDUCTION tool. When the signal goes below the threshold, it stops reducing gain. Most of us run compressors on individual channels and more on the various mix buses. All of those let loose when the signal level falls…overall gain goes up, feedback ensues. Gates and plugins like PSE can help combat this (along with mixing 😂)

    • @timhoffmann5022
      @timhoffmann5022 3 місяці тому

      that actually makes a lot more sense! i dont know how the decorelation of the microphones should play a role. I mean as he demonstrated, the feedback doesnt depend on Signal source level, rather the system amplification and frequency response. The source signal is not part of the equation (Ahnert & Reichardt 1981). So your explanation would fit into that theory.

  • @surajbhan6549
    @surajbhan6549 3 місяці тому

    Make a video for car audio measurements with single microphone 🎤 with smart and what setting keep while taking a measurement in car

  • @inthemix2805
    @inthemix2805 3 місяці тому

    I'm trying to learn better alignment in the field, especially as you say, sometimes with very limited time to run tests. Using 80hz as the example like you do in the video, what if I just reverse polarity of one of them, say the subs, run a test tone of 80 hz through both speakers. Then I add delay to the closest speaker to my listening location until I hear cancellation. Once I flip phase back, I should have summation, but am I also aligned (roughly)?

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively 3 місяці тому

      Hey there inthemix, please see if this helps: ua-cam.com/video/_KdMlCEblgE/v-deo.htmlsi=O1CXqMkYjbmbBY4g

  • @fierybones
    @fierybones 3 місяці тому

    4 * 1.67 = 6.68

    • @StevenKellyMCC
      @StevenKellyMCC 3 місяці тому

      That's a typo: it should be 1.167 (the 7/6 in the previous line). The other lines work then.